The Personal Website of Mark W. Dawson
Containing His Articles, Observations, Thoughts, Meanderings,
and some would say Wisdom (and some would say not).
The Rise of Intelligent Life
In my Science Articles, “Intelligent
Life in the Universe” and “The
Fire of Mankind”, I examine the possibilities and
probabilities of intelligent life in our universe. This article
examines the steps required to produce intelligent life on a
planet orbiting a star.
Steps for the Rise of Intelligent Life
- The first step is the creation of a Planetary System around a
star which originates in the right type of Galaxy
(most likely a spiral galaxy), the right galactic location (not
too close to or too far from the galactic nucleus which
determine Cosmic
ray and Cosmic
dust impacts on life), and with the proper stellar
classification that would allow life to form (basically, a not
too hot or not too cold Main
Sequence star).
- Then, a Gaseous
Nebula in this proper galactic location with sufficient
mass to collapse into a star with sufficient heavy elements
requisite for terrestrial planetary formation. In addition, this
collapse should result in a single star creation, as there is
some doubt that life could form and evolve in a binary or
multiple-star
- A star created from a gaseous nebula cloud, which contains
molecular chains that are needed to seed the terrestrial planet
with proto-life by means of meteoric or cometary impacts.
- A Planetary System with the right arrangement of planets in
the planetary system (i.e., the terrestrial planets close in and
gas giants further out from the star). Any other arrangement
would destabilize the orbit of a terrestrial planet and
negatively impact life creation and evolution.
- A terrestrial planet of the right size, mass, and gravity in a
Habitable
(Goldilocks) Zone, in a stable orbit around the star. This
habitable zone is neither too hot nor too cold, allows for
liquid water, and for the possibility of life as we know it.
- A proper planetary orbit
around the Star and the proper rotation
of the Planet, which controls the temperature and the seasons of
a planet, which are essential to the creation and evolution of
life.
- A terrestrial planet with an elliptical eccentricity that
does not bring it too close (Perihelion) nor too far
(Aphelion) within the Goldilocks Zone from its star.
- A terrestrial planet with the proper rotational axis and
diurnal period.
- A terrestrial planet with a magnetosphere to deflect
extraterrestrial radiation.
- A terrestrial planet with the proper atmosphere conducive to
life, i.e., sufficient nitrogen and not too much or too little
oxygen or carbon dioxide, and only trace amounts of other gases.
- A terrestrial planet where the asteroid and meteor bombardment
does not massively evaporate surface water or destroy the life
that was created on the planet.
- A terrestrial planet with large quantities of surface water to
expedite life creation and evolution.
- A terrestrial planet with insufficient geological or
meteorological forces that would result in the evaporation of
surface water or pollution of the atmosphere, which would be
destructive to life.
- A terrestrial planet with a large moon that exerts tidal
forces on the water and mantle of the planet, which allows for
the molecular chains to slosh around and contact, then combine
with each other.
- A terrestrial planet with Continents
and Plate
tectonics for geothermal energy and heavy elements to be
released from the core of the planet.
- One or more (unknown) evolutionary triggers for microbial and
complex life to form in water.
- A complex life form that migrates from water to land masses to
evolve into multiple plant and animal life forms.
- A complex animal life that evolves with dexterous fingers and
opposing thumbs to manipulate objects.
- The further evolution of this dexterous-fingered and opposable
thumbs species to a bipedal species with dexterous toes for
bipedal balance control.
- The further evolution of this bipedal species with enhanced
multiple sensory systems that are not predominated by one
sensory system, and whose field of senses is not constrained to
their immediate vicinity.
- The loss of fear of fire and the gaining of control over fire.
- The rise of food cooking.
When all these criteria are met, then intelligent life is
possible and indeed probable. However, if any one of these
criteria is not met, then intelligent life is less possible and
more improbable. If multiple criteria are not met, then the
possibility and probability of intelligent life are almost zero.
Steps 1 and 2 probably eliminate over half the stars in a galaxy.
Consequently, although there are a vast number of stars with
planetary systems in our Milky Way galaxy, the number of stars
that meet this criterion is considerably less but still very
large. Steps 3 through 11 eliminate many other planetary systems
that have formed, as these planets would be unsuitable for the
creation and evolution of life, although simple life may be
possible on some of these planets.
In my opinion, it is step 12 (a large moon that exerts a tidal
force) that has a very low probability of occurring. Our Moon is
unique in the Solar System for its size/mass ratio to its planet.
All the other moons in the Solar System have a low size/mass
compared to their planet. Therefore, their moons have little tidal
force on their planet, and with little tidal forces, the plate
tectonics of step 13 are unlikely to occur.
The Origin of the Moon is usually explained by a Mars-sized body
striking the Earth, making a debris ring that eventually collected
into a single natural satellite, the Moon, but there are a number
of variations on this giant-impact hypothesis, as well as
alternative explanations, and research continues into how the Moon
came to be. The standard giant-impact hypothesis suggests that a
smaller proto-terrestrial body impacted on a larger
proto-terrestrial body, creating a large debris ring around Earth,
which then accreted to form a large moon. This collision also
resulted in an Axial
tilt of approximately 23.44 degrees between its rotational
axis and its orbital axis, which is responsible for the seasons
and variations of temperatures across the globe.
Outer space is vast, even on the scale of the Solar System.
Having two such massive bodies collide has a low
probability, especially if their orbital inclinations around the
star are different. In addition, if the colliding body had
insufficient mass or too large a mass, this collision would not
have occurred in a manner that produces a large moon. Also, the
angle of the collision could not be too large or too small;
otherwise, the creation of an Earth-Moon system with a large moon
would not occur. This is because a head-on collision would result
in a large terrestrial planet as both bodies collapsed into one
body, or a small moon in a glancing collision, as the smaller body
would ricochet away from the larger body and not become part of
the moon. The result of such a collision would also have to create
the proper rotational axis and diurnal period of the terrestrial
planet for life to form and evolve, which also has a low
probability. Therefore, the creation of an Earth-Moon system with
a large moon seems unlikely to occur in our galaxy, except in rare
cases. Consequently, without a large moon that exerts tidal
forces, it is quite improbable that steps thirteen through twenty
occur. We can therefore conclude that the rise of intelligent life
in our galaxy occurs infrequently because of steps 1 through 6.
The evolutionary triggers of Step 14 are difficult to ascertain,
as all the evidence has been destroyed through the geological
ages. Thus, science is unable to determine the early stages of the
creation of microbial life, or the factors that allowed microbial
life to evolve into complex life forms. The central question of
this evolution is how complex life forms can arise from simplistic
life forms, and how the structural, functional, and genomic
complexity of life occurred. This is especially true of the Cambrian
explosion, which occurred approximately 538.8 million years
ago and lasted for about 13 to 25 million years, when a sudden
radiation of complex life occurred and practically all major
animal phyla started appearing in the fossil record.
Steps 15 through 18 are more understandable and explained by the
science of Anthropology,
as science has evidence as to how this occurred. Step 17, the rise
of a bipedal species, is indirectly related to the formation of a
moon with a large size/mass ratio compared to its planet. This
large size/mass ratio is responsible for the tidal force on Earth,
which contributes to Plate Tectonics. Plate tectonics is the
scientific theory that explains how the Earth's outer layer,
called the lithosphere, is divided into large, rigid plates that
move over the semi-fluid asthenosphere beneath. This movement
causes geological phenomena such as earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, and the formation of mountains.
There are over one hundred species of primates inhabiting the
world, but only one of these species has developed intelligence.
The question is why only one species of primate developed
intelligence. The answer to this question is a byproduct of Plate
tectonics. A primate species evolved over the East
African Rift fault line, which was separating. At the
beginning of this separation, the landscape above the fault line
was dense forest. As this rift separated, the forest became less
dense, with patches of unforested land between the trees. The
primates who lived above this rift foraged for food in the trees
by jumping or swinging between the dense trees. They, therefore,
had to climb down the trees and scamper on four limbs on the
unforested land to another group of trees to continue their
foraging. As scampering on four limbs is not efficient and
somewhat slow for a tree dweller, they became easier prey for the
carnivores on the ground.
This primate species above the rift evolved so that they stood up
on their hind legs and ran upright between the trees, a more
efficient and faster means of locomotion, with less likelihood of
being captured and devoured by a predator. In their becoming
erect, there were other physiological changes that occurred,
particularly with their senses. In becoming erect, their vision
was higher, and their field of view became further afield. This
also allowed them to better spot the predators from farther away.
Their senses of sound and smell also increased in range, which
also allowed them to better spot the predators from farther away.
In addition, it was easier to twist and turn their bodies to
direct their senses in all directions to spot predators and to
better spot food sources.
Thus, Steps 19 and 20 are essential for the development of
intelligent life. Fire – unexpected and uncontrollable by all
species of animal life is a primal fear of all animals. No species
knew when or where a fire would occur, and when it occurred, it
was uncontrollable. To be afraid of fire and to flee from fire was
necessary for survival. The erect stance of these evolved primates
allowed them to spot the direction and speed of the forest fires
before the fire was upon them. By spotting the forest fire earlier
and determining the speed and direction of the forest fire, the
primates were able to avoid much of the destructiveness of the
fire, which lessened their fear of fire. With their sensory
improvements, the primates were also able to approach the remnants
of the fire with little fear, which led them to consume the animal
flesh that died in the fire. They also learned to handle the fire
embers for warmth purposes and to defend against predators, which
allowed them to live on land rather than in the trees.
Eventually, they learned how to utilize fire for cooking
purposes, and they became hunters as well as gatherers of food. As
I have written in my article on “The
Fire of Mankind”, consuming cooked flesh was a huge
advancement in intelligence. All animals consumed uncooked food.
Herbivores feed chiefly on grasses and other plants, while
Carnivores feed on flesh, and Omnivores, which these primates
were, fed on both animal and vegetable substances. All
animals spend a significant amount of their daily activities on
food gathering, eating, and digesting food. Some estimates put
this time up to 80% of the waking hours animals spend on food
foraging, eating, and digesting. Cooking is a form of
pre-digesting food outside of your body, which significantly
reduces the amount of time for eating and digestive activities.
Also, digesting food takes a considerable amount of metabolic
energy, energy that was saved with cooking, and energy that could
be utilized for other purposes. Therefore, these primates had more
time and energy for activities outside of digestion, which led to
a developing, intelligent, and energy-consuming brain. This
intelligent brain also allowed them to become more efficient in
scavenging and hunting for food, and they also developed increased
social skills, which increased their intellectual abilities.
Consequently, while many of these steps are low-probability
events, all of these steps are necessary for intelligent
life to arise on a terrestrial planet. At the same time you need
to consider that an Apocalyptic Event could wipe out life, as I
have written in my science article on “Apocalyptic Events”.
The Timeline of Intelligent Life
As shown in the following diagram, the Earth is about 4.5 billion
years old, and the evolution of microbial life on Earth started
about 3.7 billion years ago. The earliest evidence of complex
cells with tiny cellular structures that perform specific
functions within a cell dates back to 1.85 billion years, while
more complex life forms began about 850 million years ago. The
Cambrian Explosion event occurred approximately 541 million years
ago when most major animal phyla appeared in the fossil record. It
lasted for about 13 – 25 million years and resulted in the
divergence of most modern life forms. Primate evolution is the
evolutionary process that led to the emergence of modern humans,
beginning with the evolutionary history of primates—in particular,
genus Homo—and leading to the emergence of Homo Sapiens as a
distinct species of the hominid family of the great apes. Within
the apes' superfamily, the Hominidae family diverged from the
Gibbon family some 15–20 million years ago; African great apes
diverged from Orangutans about 14 million years ago; and humanlike
bipedal primates, other extinct biped genera, and the chimpanzees
parted from the gorilla tribe between 8–9 million years ago. The
humans and their biped ancestors and chimpanzees separated from
the others about 6 to 7 million years ago.
As this diagram illustrates, the evolution of life on Earth took
an enormous amount of time, and even the 6 to 7 million years it
took for humans to evolve is an extremely large amount of time.
Always keep in mind the enormity of time whenever you think about
evolution. This enormity of time increases the likelihood of life
evolving on a terrestrial planet.
Given the enormous time scale for the creation of a terrestrial
planet capable of supporting life (approximately a billion years),
where microbial life arose (billions of years), and then complex
life arose (hundreds of millions of years), it seems highly
unlikely that an extraterrestrial intelligence in our galaxy
occurred in the same time frame as ourselves. Therefore, the real
question is not the number of extraterrestrial planets with
intelligent beings, but the number of extraterrestrial planets
with intelligent beings in their current state of evolutionary,
scientific, and technological development that could communicate
or visit each other.
Given that the evolution of terrestrial planets occurred in fits
and starts, and the progress of the evolution of humans was
uneven, it seems unlikely that extraterrestrial intelligence
proceeded in the same timeline and pace as humans. If
extraterrestrial planets with intelligent beings evolved, they are
more likely to be ahead or behind the evolutionary, scientific,
and technological development of human intelligence. Therefore, to
have two or more extraterrestrial civilizations at the same stage
of development at the same time is highly unlikely.
In addition. If you think about where human civilization was at
the beginning of the 20th century versus where we are at the
beginning of the 21st century, we probably will have little
interest in communicating with an earlier 20th-century
civilization, and probably no interest in communicating with a
pre-20th-century civilization. After all, they had no radio or
television, no air or space flight, automobiles were newfangled
and scarce, electrification and the utilization of fossil fuels
were just beginning, industrialization was just starting, and
labor was a crude and brute force process. And where will we be at
the end of the 21st century? Anyone living today would probably
not recognize our civilization at the end of the 21st century due
to our rapid advancement of science and technology. And other
advanced extraterrestrial intelligent life would probably have the
same attitude about communicating or visiting civilizations that
are well behind their current state of evolutionary, scientific,
and technological development.
The Fermi
Paradox refers to the contradiction between the high
probability of extraterrestrial intelligence life in the universe
and the lack of evidence or contact with such civilizations, as I
have written in my science article on “Intelligent
Life in the Universe”. Despite the vast number of stars and
potentially habitable planets, we have not observed any signs of
intelligent life, leading to various theories about why this
silence exists. The most likely explanation is that
extraterrestrial intelligence that coexists in the same timeframe
as us is not very probable. If there were extraterrestrial
intelligence that coexists in the same 100-year time frame, it may
not be impossible for us to ever communicate with them, let alone
visit them, as I examine later in this article.
The Probability of the Evolution of Life to Intelligent Life
Consequently, given these twenty steps for the rise of
intelligent life, the question is of the probability of
intelligent life arising on an extraterrestrial planet.
Probability is a branch of Mathematics, which is the pursuit of
knowledge unconstrained by the physical properties of the
universe. Much of mathematics has no foundation in reality, but
much mathematics is needed to explain reality. Mathematical
Theorems are a rigorous pursuit of mathematical truths that
require strict standards for the proofs. Less strict standards for
Mathematical Conjectures are allowed, but such conjectures are not
a proof, but speculations that require a proof to be developed to
be accepted as a Mathematical Theorem. Mathematics, therefore,
cannot be utilized to prove anything except that the mathematics
is correct. Scientific Theories are the best explanation of
physical phenomena that fit all the known facts, and much science
requires a mathematical foundation to be proven correct. Also,
scientific theories cannot be “proven”, as new facts are often
discovered, which requires that the Scientific Theory be modified
or replaced, as outlined in my Science Article “On the
Nature of Scientific Inquiry“.
As for mathematical probabilities, one of the common mistakes
that many people make is that they only examine the beginning and
end states to determine the probability of an event occurring. To
determine the probability of reaching an end state requires that
you not just consider the start and endpoints; you must examine
the probability of each intermediate state, which often has a much
higher or lower probability than a simple start-end state
probability. Therefore, you must examine all the numerous
intermediate state probabilities and their interrelationships to
determine the end state probability. When you aggregate the
probabilities of the intermediate states, this aggregation makes
for a more acceptable probability of the end state.
While the probabilities in steps 1 through 6 can be roughly
estimated, steps 7 through 11 are harder to estimate. The
probability of steps 12 and 13 can be estimated, but only with
many assumptions that can be difficult to vindicate. The biggest
unknowns are in step 14, the evolutionary triggers for life to
arise and evolve into intelligent life, as the evidence and
knowledge of what these triggers were have been destroyed through
the geological ages. Given that the evolutionary triggers for life
to arise and evolve into intelligent life are unknown, any
probability calculation for the evolution of life into intelligent
life is highly suspect. A Dendrogram for the process of the
evolution of life makes this visually apparent. This Dendrogram is
very basic, as it only shows a few levels of branch points, but
the branch points in the evolution of life are of many levels. It
also only shows two-prong branch points, while these branch points
often have multiple branches. It also does not show that some
branches end because of extinction events.
Step 15 is more probable once complex life forms migrate from
water to land. We also have more knowledge of what occurred after
the land migration started, as some of this evidence has been
preserved in fossils. The science of Paleontology
is the scientific study of the life of the past, mainly but not
exclusively through the study of fossils. Paleontologists use
fossils as a means to classify organisms, measure geologic time,
and assess the interactions between prehistoric organisms and
their natural environment. Paleontology is a mature science, but
it has many unknowns, as much fossil evidence has been destroyed
through geological processes. As such, probabilities can be
difficult to determine, but the History
of life can be ascertained.
Steps 16 through 20 are determined by the science of Anthropology,
which studies Human
evolution. Anthropology is the scientific study of humanity
that crosses biology and sociology, concerned with human behavior,
human biology, cultures, societies, and linguistics, in both the
present and past, including archaic humans. The factors for the
probabilities of Paleontology are also true for the factors for
the probabilities of Anthropology.
If you calculate the probability of life by the probabilities of
the intermediate states, life is more probable than the
probability of a start and endpoint probability calculation. And
since life did happen on Earth, we can conclude that life was
probable on Earth. As to the probability of intelligent life
evolving on another planet, this is examined in my Science Article
on “Intelligent
Life in the Universe“.
Communicating or Visiting with Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life
One of the peculiarities of the human mind is its inability to
grasp the very small and the very large. We place numbers on the
very small and very large to assist us in comprehending them.
However, we can never fully grasp them in their entirety. The
Enormousness of Time and the Vastness of Space in the Universe is
something that the human mind is incapable of grasping. A universe
that is 13.8 billion years old, and perhaps almost a hundred
billion light-years in size, is not something a human being can
fully grasp. The vastness of space is germane to step 12 of this
article, but the enormousness of time is germane to all the steps
necessary for the rise of intelligent life. Thus, we must keep in
mind the enormity of time whenever we discuss evolution.
In the previous three sections of this article, I examined the
possibility of extraterrestrial intelligent life and whether
extraterrestrial intelligent life arose in our galaxy in the same
timeframe as our own intelligent life. If such a possibility
occurred, would it be possible for them or us to communicate or
visit each other?
Given the immense distances between stars and the limitations of
the speed of light, such communications may take several decades
or more to travel between the two stars. A two-way conversation
between extraterrestrial intelligent life would therefore be
almost impossible to maintain and may even be impossible to
understand. Translating from one human language to another is
fraught with problems, as anyone who has learned to read, write,
and speak a second language is aware. Even when the languages are
similar, there are a multitude of problems. When learning
dissimilar languages, i.e., English and Mandarin, the problems are
of a greater magnitude. It is possible for humans to do this, as
we are all human and have many commonalities that assist us in
this translation. Now imagine trying to learn an alien language in
which there are few commonalities.
As to travel between these extraterrestrial civilizations, the
immense distances between them are also prohibitive. Given the
energy required, as well as the scientific, technological,
engineering, and ecological factors to sustain life for the
duration of the trip, it would be extremely difficult, if not
impossible, to achieve. Even the sci-fi speculation of such things
as warp drive, wormholes, subspace, and other exotic means of
transportation would be an immense scientific, technological, and
engineering feat and could make the trip impossible. And we must
also keep in mind that it is not possible to violate the Fundamental Properties of the Universe and
account for the
The Four Forces of Nature in doing so. In my Science
Article, “Science
vs. Science Fiction”, I examine the issues of the
Fundamental Properties of the Universe, Energy Requirements, The
Immensity of Space and Time, That Which is Seen and That Which is
Unseen, and the Miscellaneous Science-Fiction Issues as they
pertain to interstellar space travel.
You should also be careful about wanting to communicate or meet
extraterrestrial civilizations. Human history has many sad
examples of when a more advanced society meets a less advanced
society. It has often been the case that the less advanced society
suffers tremendously, if not being obliterated.
With the recent release of the government's knowledge of
‘Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs)’, or ‘Unidentified
Aerial Phenomena (UAPs)’, much speculation has arisen that these
objects are visitations from extraterrestrial intelligent life.
There is no doubt that these sightings are unidentified, that they
are aerial (as opposed to land or sea), and that they are a
phenomenon, but are they visitations from extraterrestrial
intelligent life? When analyzing UAPs, you must keep in mind the
Philosophical Occam's razor:
"Simpler explanations are more
likely to be correct; avoid unnecessary or improbable
assumptions."
Or:
"The simplest explanation, that
fits all the known facts, is most often the correct explanation."
To presume that these UAPs are visitations from extraterrestrial
intelligent life is to violate this razor. There is no question
that we should investigate these sightings to determine their true
nature. But these UAPs are more likely to be natural and of a
nature that we do not have knowledge about. To jump to the
conclusion that they are visitations from an extraterrestrial
intelligent life is a leap too great for any rational person to
make. Flights of fantasy are wonderful human imaginations, but
flights of fantasy are not a way to scientifically investigate
these phenomena. Let us rein in the speculation and determine the
truth of these phenomena.
Consequently, communicating or visiting with extraterrestrial
intelligent life, if they exist, appears to be so great a task
that it is highly unlikely we can do this.
Disclaimer
Please note that my Science
Articles disclaimer applies to this article, as it does to
all of my science articles. These science articles are for the
purposes of general scientific information that is understandable
to a layperson, so that they can grasp the concepts of the topic
being discussed. As such, they are neither as accurate nor as
thorough as academics, scientists, engineers, and science writers
strive to achieve. My hope is that these science articles will be
informative and interesting, and that they will pique the reader's
interest in exploring these topics in further detail via the
hyperlinks that I have embedded into these articles.
© 2025. All rights reserved.
If you have any comments, concerns, critiques, or suggestions I
can be reached at mwd@profitpages.com.
I will review reasoned and intellectual correspondence, and it is
possible that I can change my mind,
or at least update the content of this article.
|