The Personal Website of Mark W. Dawson

Bonhoeffer, Cipolla, and Dunning-Kruger Stupidity in Modern America

Bonhoeffer’s Theory of Stupidity

Dietrich Bonhoeffer (4 February 1906 – 9 April 1945) was a German theologian during the Nazi period of German history. In examining the causes for the rise and rule of Nazism he proposed, in a short letter “After Ten Years: An Account at the Turn of the Year 1942–1943”, that stupidity was the basic cause, and that stupidity is more dangerous than evil. He argued that while evil can be identified and fought against, stupidity is harder to combat because it often goes hand-in-hand with power and can be manipulated by those with malicious intent.

Key Principles

Definition of Stupidity:

• Stupidity vs. Ignorance: Stupidity is a willful resistance to knowledge, while ignorance is simply a lack of knowledge. Stupid individuals often refuse to accept facts that contradict their beliefs.
• Moral Failure: Stupidity is a moral failure, where individuals surrender their critical thinking to groupthink, leading to a loss of intellectual autonomy.

Characteristics of Stupid Individuals:

• Manipulability: Stupid people can be easily influenced and used by those in power, making them dangerous.
• Self-Satisfaction: Stupid people often remain unaware of their stupidity and can become aggressive when challenged.

The Anatomy of Stupidity

Bonhoeffer wasn't referring to a simple lack of intellect. Instead, he saw stupidity as a psychological and moral condition. Here's how he broke it down:

• A Surrender of Independence: The core of stupidity is a voluntary abdication of one's own critical thinking, a willingness to surrender one's inner freedom.
• Group Conformity: This surrender is often driven by a desire to belong, to conform to a group, ideology, or leader.
• Resistance to Facts: The stupid person actively resists facts and arguments that contradict their pre-conceived notions. They are immune to reason.

Stupidity vs. Evil: A Crucial Distinction

We often equate evil with malice – a conscious desire to inflict harm. But Bonhoeffer argued that stupidity is a far more potent and dangerous foe. Why? Because evil, at least, understands itself. It knows what it's doing. Stupidity, on the other hand, is often blind, self-satisfied, and utterly impervious to reason. It's not a lack of intelligence; it's a moral failing. A Philosopheasy webpage, “Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Terrifying Theory of Stupidity”, elaborates on this distinction.

Implications of Stupidity

Bonhoeffer's theory suggests that societies with a high proportion of stupid individuals may struggle to progress. The ability to counteract the negative effects of stupidity depends on the presence of intelligent individuals who can mitigate the losses caused by the stupid. However, there is no guarantee that intelligent individuals can mitigate the harmful impacts of a large number of Bonhoeffer stupid people in a society if they become a potent political force.

Consequences of Stupidity

As Bonhoeffer notes, stupid people consider themselves always right and morally superior. They have no difficulty suppressing the Natural Rights of those who disagree with them, believing they are doing so for the “Greater Good” of society. In their zeal, they also believe it is morally permissible to use violence against their opponents and to impose their will on others through government action.

Conclusion on Bonhoeffer Stupidity

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was arrested and executed for his actions during the rise and rule of Nazism. He was hanged two weeks before the Allies liberated the concentration camp where he was imprisoned. The Bonhoeffer Stupid German people were only liberated with their destruction as a result of World War II. For when Bonhoeffer Stupidity grips a society, it often leads to the destruction of that society.

Cipolla’s Stupidity

Carlo M. Cipolla (15 August 1922 – 5 September 2000) was an Italian economic historian.He was a member of both the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society. In an essay, "The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity" he explores the subject of stupidity. In this essay, he outlined five laws regarding stupidity and the factors to consider when exploring human behavior.

Cipolla's Laws of Stupidity

Cipolla defines “stupidity” as an action that causes losses to others (or a group) while the person causing it gets no gain and may even suffer losses. His “golden law” is that this behavior is not tied to IQ or other personal traits—stupidity is judged by the effects of what someone does. These laws are:

1. Everyone underestimates the number of stupid people.
2. The probability of a person being stupid is independent of other characteristics.
3. A stupid person causes losses to others without any benefit to themselves. The factors to consider when evaluating benefits and losses are:
   
   •  Benefits and losses that individuals cause to themselves.
   •  Benefits and losses that individuals cause to others.
4. Non-stupid people underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
5. A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person in society.

Corollary: a stupid person is more dangerous than a pillager, because a pillager knows they are harmful and can be stopped, whereas a stupid person may believe they are helpful and usually cannot be stopped. Cipolla has also stated:

“Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.”

Conclusion on Cipolla Stupidity

As Cipolla himself said:

“It is not difficult to understand how social, political and institutional power enhances the damaging potential of a stupid person. But one still has to explain and understand what essentially it is that makes a stupid person dangerous to other people - in other words what constitutes the power of stupidity.

Essentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behaviour. An intelligent person may understand the logic of a bandit. The bandit's actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, if you like, but still rationality. The bandit wants a plus on his account. Since he is not intelligent enough to devise ways of obtaining the plus as well as providing you with a plus, he will produce his plus by causing a minus to appear on your account. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are rational you can predict it. You can foresee a bandit's actions, his nasty manoeuvres and ugly aspirations and often can build up your defenses.

With a stupid person all this is absolutely impossible as explained by the Third Basic Law. A stupid creature will harass you for no reason, for no advantage, without any plan or scheme and at the most improbable times and places. You have no rational way of telling if and when and how and why the stupid creature attacks. When confronted with a stupid individual you are completely at his mercy. Because the stupid person's actions do not conform to the rules of rationality,  it follows that:

a) one is generally caught by surprise by the attack;
b) even when one becomes aware of the attack, one cannot organize a rational defense, because the attack itself lacks any rational structure.

The fact that the activity and movements of a stupid creature are absolutely erratic and irrational not only makes defense problematic but it also makes any counter-attack extremely difficult - like trying to shoot at an object which is capable of the most improbable and unimaginable movements.”

The Dunning-Kruger Effect

The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which individuals with low ability in a specific area overestimate their competence due to a lack of self-awareness. A good overview of this bias is available in both the Psychology Today article and the Healthline article. This phenomenon occurs because these individuals lack the self-awareness needed to accurately assess their skills. Recognizing one's own incompetence requires a level of self-awareness that those affected do not possess.

Key Characteristics

• Overestimation of Skills: People with limited knowledge often believe they are more skilled than they actually are.
• Lack of Self-Awareness: They struggle to recognize their deficiencies, leading to inflated self-assessments.
• Double Curse: Not only do they perform poorly, but their lack of self-awareness prevents them from learning and improving.

Causes of the Dunning-Kruger Effect

Several factors contribute to this cognitive bias:

• Metacognitive Deficits: Individuals with low competence lack the ability to evaluate their performance accurately.
• Confidence Over Competence: Many prefer to appear knowledgeable rather than risk looking inadequate, which can lead to overconfidence.
• Misunderstanding of Skill Transfer: People often mistakenly believe that skills in one area can easily transfer to another, exacerbating their overconfidence.

Impact on Various Domains

The Dunning-Kruger effect has been observed in various fields, including:

Domain	Examples of Impact
Education	Students overestimating their knowledge and test scores.
Workplace	Employees who believe they are more competent than their peers.
Political Activism	Individuals involved in politics who often believe they are more intelligent, better informed, and more righteous than others.
Social Skills	Individuals who misjudge their importance and social interaction abilities.

Synopsis

The Dunning-Kruger effect can lead individuals with limited expertise to overestimate their knowledge and competence, resulting in poor decision-making and strategic errors. This cognitive bias is particularly detrimental in leadership roles, where it may cause leaders to make harmful choices due to a lack of awareness of their limitations.

The Dunning–Kruger effect appears when people with low skill overestimate their competence, while high performers underestimate theirs. Examples include junior employees claiming leadership readiness without mastering basics, low-performing salespeople blaming lead quality instead of their own skills, and technical staff refusing training because they believe they already know everything.

Individuals can recognize the Dunning–Kruger effect by seeking regular, objective feedback from peers and supervisors and by comparing their self-assessment with actual performance data. Mitigation involves embracing humility, focusing on continuous learning, and using structured self-evaluation tools to identify and address skill gaps.

Disputations

Since the original study was published in 1999, various studies have produced similar results. But in recent years, some researchers have called into question the statistical model that Dunning and Kruger used. There are also criticisms that people are overusing the theory when it is not really relevant.

Conclusion on Dunning-Kruger effect

The Dunning-Kruger effect allows those so afflicted to make pronouncements or take actions that a reasonable person would not consider. It also allows a person who is highly competent in one area of their endeavors to believe that this competence transfers to other spheres in which they lack the knowledge, intelligence, wisdom, and foresight to comment properly. It also highlights the importance of self-awareness in skill assessment, and understanding this bias can help individuals recognize their limitations and encourage personal growth.

Modern America Repercussions

America is now in a deep schism between Democrat Party Leaders, Democratic Socialists, Progressives/Leftists, and Republican Party Leaders, Conservatives, and MAGA supporters, with only a few centrists. Centrism is the range of political ideologies that exist between left-wing politics and right-wing politics on the left–right political spectrum. It is associated with moderate politics on the left-right spectrum, including people who strongly support moderate policies and those who are not strongly aligned with left-wing or right-wing policies.

As I have examined in my Chip on “04/01/19 Both Sides Do It”, in the human experience, both sides do everything. That is the nature of humankind. Whenever an issue confronts our society, the extremes on both sides often use the same methods and tactics to attack the other side. Therefore, the statement that both sides do it is irrelevant. The question is whether the mainstream and/or leadership on each side do it and how much attention is paid to the extremes. In America today, Bonhoeffer Stupidity, Cipolla Stupidity, and the Dunning-Kruger effect exist on both sides of the political spectrum. However, in right-wing politics, these stupidities are mild, not extensive, and not in control of their politics, while in left-wing politics, they are extensive, deep-rooted, and have taken over the mainstream and/or leadership of left-wing politics. Much of this takeover has been driven by Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).

Unfortunately, Bonhoeffer Stupidity, Cipolla Stupidity, and the Dunning-Kruger effect are very difficult to overcome, as those so afflicted listen only to others who are likewise afflicted. And those so afflicted want to impose their politics on America. They will not listen to Rationality and Reasoning that contradict their viewpoint, and they will often Demonize, Denigrate, Disparage (The Three D's) anyone who disagrees with them.

In American history, we have faced deep schisms before the Revolutionary War and the Civil War, and violence during the Reconstruction era, organized labor conflicts, the Civil Rights riots, and the Vietnam War protests, all of which involved violence in resolving the disputes. We are now approaching that state again in modern American politics. The left wing will neither concede nor compromise its positions because of Bonhoeffer Stupidity, Cipolla Stupidity, and the Dunning-Kruger effect. Because it refuses to listen to its opponents and has engaged in violence in the last decade, it has set us on a path of violence to resolve our differences. Let us hope we can avoid this violence by the ballot box, by turning out of political power those who suffer from Bonhoeffer Stupidity, Cipolla Stupidity, and the Dunning-Kruger effect. Alas, this turning out of political power is no cure for Bonhoeffer Stupidity, Cipolla Stupidity, and the Dunning-Kruger effect, but only an avoidance of large-scale violence by both sides in America.